PLEASE LISTEN TO THE ABOVE LINK!
You will miss the point of this post if you neglect Part 1
which is linked in the following title!
In part one of this trilogy
I stumbled upon a coincidence of Joseph of Arimathea/Josephus Flavius
marriage to the church
and the marriage of Jackie Kennedy to Aristotle Onassis (the Greek Shipping Tycoon)
and this is how this particular post came about!
After my conclusions about the Kennedy assassination I was intrigued and curious why Jackie Kennedy would be so bold as to kill her husband in broad daylight in front of cameras and people, etc. I went through quite a few emotions and ideas kept popping in my head about his supposed affairs except vaguely, and over time, reading about them with Marilyn Monroe. I always still had a deep respect for our President and his stance publicly for truth and openness and I have always hated that he was assassinated. I also hate the secrecy associated with the findings about the assassination! His private life might not have been perfect, but he seemed like a Perfect President. And more than likely there is more to their story than what meets the eye!
I always thought highly of Mrs. Kennedy and her kids. After looking at many pictures of her, she is even more beautiful than I remember. But comparing her to the woman on the screen in the Zapruder film I just wasn’t satisfied with my conclusions, even though I think that woman did assassinate President Kennedy.
To start I would like to divulge again that I am a portrait artist and I notice features a little more closely than the average person. So I decided to compare pictures of her to see if possibly, by chance, that the woman in the Zapruder film might be someone else. I found quite a few pictures and compared them to each other to see if and when she might have been replaced with a double. I know that sounds preposterous, but there is no doubt in my mind after seeing the Zapruder film over and over, and studying it closely, that she looks and acted very guilty, yet Jacky Kennedy doesn’t seem to be the type of woman to be so calculating and cold. The person on the screen in the film acts like a professional hit woman. So after writing the article The Covenant with Many and the deception involved and how the assassination of President Kennedy seems to cor-relate in very strange ways especially Jackie’s marriage later to Aristotle Onassis I had to look into it deeper than I ever have.
But I kept running into the dilemma of mirror-image confusion. If you take an object and stick it in your right hand and go to the mirror it will be in your left hand. In many of the pictures of her she would part her hair on the left and sometimes on the right.
(I put the web addresses for you to put in your title bar to go to the picture to see it larger because my blog will not show it large enough to see a clearly)
This is the first lady at Taj Mahal on one of her many trips. In the picture above her purse is on her left arm and the part in her hair is on the left and her leg is poised forward on the left when facing her (or her right) and on the picture above that it is the exact opposite. I spent a long time pondering and studying these pictures because she is wearing the same dress and obviously it is the same day, right?
…..it appears that way anyway.
Then I realized the mirror-image dilemma.
DID WE HAVE THAT PROCESS VIA PHOTOSHOP BACK IN THOSE DAYS…..
I HAVE NO IDEA?
But we do now!
Most people rarely change their part from the left to the right, or visa versa. But with mirror-image I could not get past the confusion, until I put her with another person …..her husband.
Men never change their parts, especially back in those days. So I studied a bunch of pictures of them together and in every shot I could find of the two of them together, their parts were always on the same side. His would be on his right when facing him and hers was on the right when facing her when they were side by side. So if you looked at them they were two right parts, like they matched.
Both have their parts on the right above.
Again, again and again!
Both have their parts on the right again!
Both have their parts on the same side again like parallel as the other two above!
And again. Hard to see but their parts are on the right.
Again both President Kennedy and Mrs Kennedy have their parts on the right when you are facing them.
Jackie’s Pink Suit– more examples two Jackies
“It was at President Kennedy’s request that she wear the outfit in Dallas.
He said she looked “ravishing in it.”
(Susan Mary Alsop, 1963)”
Now before the assassination in Dallas
Now her part is on the left and his is still on the right when you are facing them!
Both parts in the center.
Their parts are opposite each other as they sit next to each other.
Hers on the left and his on the right.
HIs part is on the right and hers on the left as you face them!
Now their parts are on the inside. Hers on the left and his on the right.
This woman is not Jackie Kennedy!
Not only did her part change ……..but so did her shins. Jackie Kennedy had sort of boney shins and the imposter has thick shins in comparison. Shins don’t change over the years except with extreme weight gain. Eventually, I will update this post with examples. The woman at the funeral of JFK was not the real Jackie Kennedy….unless Jackie replaced her legs with someone else’s legs.
also shows the parts of both President Kennedy and woman in the car with him
in this you tube linked in purple above!
Below is the Zapruder film for you to see
the cold blooded assassination of our President
by what I believe is a double of the first lady.
Somewhere, somehow, something happened to her
and she was replaced!
Perhaps on her trip to India?
Here are 2 you tubes linked to study:
335 of the last sequence of the slow motion concentrated on President Kennedy, Jackie Kennedy has something in her hand
behind his back,
because it is perpendicular to the horizon. It is either heat and smoke or has been touched up to hide what she is holding ….
It appears that the woman “Jackie Kennedy double” is the person that
signals with a Princess wave
in the direction of the Secret Service guard at the back of the car by the side of President Kennedy,
who shrugged three times and lagged behind! IMO
The link below (Part One of this trilogy:The Covenant with Many) has a few you tubes of the assassination and one in particular that examines the Secret Service and their innocence and seems pretty accurate, except for the fact that the woman representing Jacqueline Kennedy does wave in the direction of the Secret Service guard, and he backs off and shrugs 3 times, even though he was supposed to be on the heel of the car protecting the President.
Below this title and link is a snippet of the post!
She is fiddling with him as he is shot the first time, then Connelly looks back and she looks at Connelly and he is shot, she looks back at her husband and gets closer and under him and he is shot again and the blood spray goes up, then
it looks as if she has something in her right hand after the second shot
(perhaps a silencer and it looks like Captain Hook’s arm without the hook?).
And it seems to be emitting gas straight up! And if I am correct it probably came with her red roses!
Who was the florist?
Supposedly, Jackie thought it was odd that she received red roses in Dallas in one of her infamous interviews spinning her Camelot myth.
Possibly, lost that object when she pushed her husband over and fled to the trunk of the car to get whatever was back there, and it looks like a tube of lipstick because of the way it stays on the trunk of the car. She pursues it on the trunk of the car and gets it and gets back and hunches down with everyone else.
*April 2nd 2011 Just watched this video again a few times and it looks like she is the only one that seems to be busy …..very active….and in control…….everyone else seems to be reacting.
Everyone else seems to be in slow motion and she is in very fast motion.
Whoever her focus is on seems to be before that person is shot! IMO
Which is very disturbing!”
Basically, what I am trying to say in the above snippet of the post is that she is running circles around everyone and most people in a state of shock do not react so quickly unless they are the perpetrator!
…….how could that possibly be true if she was on the trunk of the car
picking up things (perhaps caps?)
unless she picked up his brain parts
after she hunkered down
besides the fact that she was not Jackie Kennedy, IMO.
Here is film shot from the opposite direction as the Zapruder film and seems to match exactly, which substantiates the Zapruder films accuracy IMO!
I started to notice a lot of articles creeping into the Internet about Jackie being part Jewish, as if that has anything to do with this at all, and I realized that the propaganda machine was active, very busy, to deceive, cover up and deflect.
Case in point:
Another you tube suddenly appeared with News coverage about the Kennedy’s visit in San Antonio before the assassination.
Supposedly, this old man had kept a movie of the Kennedy’s for almost 50 years in a drawer ‘all neat and perfect’
in his attic desk and just decided to donate it.
In my opinion, it’s a fake.
President Kennedy looks like he is out to lunch, as if he is not really there, or in another place.
His actions and expressions do NOT fit the scene. And, of course, the man that
donated the film mentions that President Kennedy is confused and gives his own excuse
for why the President is acting confused!
WHICH IS VERY TELLING ….AS IF HE KNOWS!
Jackie wore her hair parted on the other side that night also. I think that was the point of this you tube…..
covering their tracks….so to speak. If you watch the you tube it looks suspicious and is very confusing, a film full of mayhem that could easily be manipulated and, in fact, if you study the film, it has a lot of discrepancies. Why anyone would go to such trouble -all of a sudden- and it magically appearing 50 years later is suspicious in its entirety. President Kennedy looks like he’s drugged. It just does not fit!!! So I am including this you tube in this article.
Jackie is wearing gloves when she enters
and then when she gives her speech she’s not wearing her gloves
which is Very Very out of character for her.
I think someones made a big error in this film.
They forgot the gloves!
That’s what happens when you are in a hurry.
Not only that, but they forgot to invite the Connally’s.
However, the Connally’s were on every other activity STRANGE and, in fact,
It is VERY VERY FISHY
— the sudden appearance of this film, that is!!!!!
Why would the Connally’s be excluded?
The whole event I have described, the odd behavior of the people involved, the exclusion of the Connally’s, leads me to believe that this was the critical point,
a watershed event
in regards to
the assassination of President Kennedy!
All I can say is, in time, all things will
be revealed and, I hope, whoever is involved
in propaganda to deceive
will change their course and do the right thing while they still have a chance
before it is too late!
Zoom in and Check out 1:54/4:22 expression of Jackie in this film. Very odd and I would call it demonic, as if she had had a fit,
or a glitch!
Does this look like Jackie Kennedy?
Check out the woman near the end of the film who seems to be trying to say something with her hand at 3:43/4:22! Perhaps she was an unwilling participant in a very ugly scam!
Then from frame 2:07/4:22 Jackie Kennedy looks at least 10/20 years older sitting with her bare hands in her pockets.
This film is full of holes!
Now compare this to the poise of the real Jackie Kennedy speaking spanish!
and her part matches her husband’s part!
I wonder if the film that suddenly surfaced didn’t steal bits and pieces from this film and many others,
but just made a few errors in the new “timely” film just now donated
because this old man all of sudden decided to part with
his sacred treasure!
There is a big difference between the women in each of these films besides the obvious glitch!
So why would this old man come up with this film 48 or so years later and decide to donate it – at this time – when he had it in his drawer the whole time?
Why would some of the news stations and press combine it with another film and put sound behind it, even though it was a silent film?
Some of the broadcasts that were aired ought to be investigated for fraud.
IT is as if the Press is hiding something that they are complicit in!
Why embellish the film?
Could it be they want you to swallow it,
hook, line and sinker?
They have the tools to deceive and they are deceiving you!
Life Magazine supposedly had the Zapruder film and parts were destroyed!
Who do they work for?
Who does the man at the Museum of The Texas School Book Depository work for that received this film and helped to affirm it’s worth. Does he have no levels or standards of integrity for a film to be accepted as historical evidence? I guess anything goes.
Even I could layer a film as bad as that one!
It is soooooooo obvious that this film is layered!
If they try to spoon feed us this film and add, of course, the other one of the same night …
does that make it true?
Because their are two films of the same scam
does that make it true?
How about 3 or 4?
Who do they serve?
For if they know or have an inkling that they are deceiving
they should quit,
but they don’t because they have to support their life style!
Basically, what happened that day:
The power of the Presidency was stolen by the Treasury Department!
The Treasury Department heads the Secret Service
which is supposed to protect the President
and his wife !!!
So we lost a branch of our government that day,
our elected President, and his wife!
That’s why there was cover-up!
IF you look real close this is a picture that has been manipulated also.
I have read so much pure junk and innuendo about JFK and his brother Bobby
and a recent released photo of JFK and Bobby with Marilyn Monroe that
from a dryer
IT is a strange photo with President Kennedy looking away.
He was embarrassed:
Because it is not him
he was wearing a grecian hair band?
he could not figure out which side
to part his hair
on that occasion!
It is not even Robert Kennedy or Marilyn Monroe!
Marilyn Monroe had a soft rounder nose and plumper lips and two shoulders
not just one and a half!
Compare her nose to the nose on the woman in the other picture. There is a big difference! IN this picture her nose is not as boney or as long as the one above and her lips are plump comparatively. Even the woman’s body is different. Marilyn Monroe was always clumsily over-weight in a very attractive way and the woman above is slender and even the breasts are different and smaller!
THIS IS RIDICULOUS….
THE PICTURE OF
PRESIDENT KENNEDY, BOBBY KENNEDY AND MARILYN MONROE
ABOVE IS A FAKE
AND SEEMS LIKE A LEFTOVER
FROM MANIPULATING PHOTOS
TO MAKE A GOOD COVERUP
(that is why it was found in a dryer of all places )
AND TARNISH THEIR REPUTATIONS
AND FALSELY PROVE A RELATIONSHIP
WITH MM FOR THAT COVERUP.
I WONDER WHY?
It is called DIS – INFORMATION!
The three people that these actors above represented were cut down early in life and I think I know why:
To fulfill prophecy in order to deceive!
It has something to do with the head wound prophecy in Revelation:
3And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death;
and his deadly wound was healed:
and all the world wondered after the beast.
THE PROPHECY WAS ALREADY FULFILLED BY ROME
SO IN ORDER TO DEFLECT THEY HAD TO FULFILL IT IN OUR COUNTRY
By the way, in his letters when JFK used the code letters
I don’t think it is in reference to Marilyn Monroe,
I found a few places that use MM for their identification!
They are MANY!
But for $$$$$$$$ and the public’s consumption they have made a
Mountain out of a Mole!
I found a few places that ALSO use MM for their identification!
an international Christian relief and evangelism organization specializing in meeting the needs of victims of war, poverty, natural disasters and disease”
More like the big fish ate the little fish. Basically, the son of Billy Graham took over a ministry. Whether foul play was involved…who knows.
The founder died from Leukemia soon after the friendship with Franklin Graham!
6This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
it is sickening!
(seems to be missing the a’s and the m)
Paragraph two is very telling! He says he took it to two of JFK’s friends but that it did not go past him ……kind of a misnomer. You don’t go to two friends to clarify, if you want to keep a secret. DUH
So what was the intent of the letter?
If you read between the lines I would call that a veiled threat, otherwise why bring it up. What friends? Was it Mr. Graham’s job to clarify rumors of JFK or was he just alerting the Senator that he had some goods on him?
KIND OF CAGEY!
Kind of gross!
I think President John F. Kennedy, Senator Bobby Kennedy, Marilyn Monroe
and many, many others were unfortunate victims of a
mafia filled church, drunk on power and deception,
that tried to make our country heel!
The mafia is obviously their creation!
They do the dirty work for the church and the church absolves them and themselves.
THEY INFILTRATE EVERY ALLEY AND DARK CORNER OF EVERY INSTITUTION TO DO THEIR MISSION!
They are the scum of the earth!
“This brings us to Benedict and Rome today. Readers will be well aware of the Vatican’s efforts after World War II to dominate Europe through the Treaty of Rome. This strategy was spearheaded by the “St Benedict for first European” campaign conceived during World War II. Pius XII may have been silent about the holocaust but he certainly made waves when one of Benedict’s early monasteries, Monte Cassino, was bombed by the allies. Churchill, unworried, correctly observed, “the enemy fortifications were hardly separate from the building itself”. But Pius castigated it as an “atrocity bombing”. He and his two successors, John XXIII and Paul VI,
all vowed to use Benedict’s European credentials to bring the continent to heel.”
We are the allies that bombed Monte Cassino!
Please read: The Synoptic “Q Source”
Special reference to Billy Graham and his part in this affair in the article linked!
They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh,
that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.
JOHN KENNEDY, HIS BROTHER BOBBY AND MARILYN MONROE
WERE MURDERED FOR
Now, we have lost our government in total to the
World Government headed by Rome!
Obviously, it was the Vatican and the Pope and their legions
THEY ARE MANY
who arranged the death of President Kennedy and probably Jacqueline!
But thank goodness it won’t last!
1And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.
2But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not;
for it is given unto the Gentiles:
and the holy city shall they tread under foot
forty and two months.
That’s about 3 1/2 years we have to put up with this nonsense!
Time is ticking!
They are the legions that want to make you believe them, nothing, or anything and everything,
but the truth!
That is their end/purpose!
The President and First Lady after the First Anniversary Inaugural Salute Dinner, 1962
Photo Credit: Cecil Stoughton, White House/John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston
I guess the photographer needed to add people and shadows….
to make it look real?
How about that eyebrow and the side burns on the man behind Jackie….
maybe Cal Thomas was attending?
In regards to Cal Thomas, he was just recently accused of Plagiarizing by a ridiculous Texas editor
(I call it relating)
FROM THE MAN ON THE LEFT AT JOHNSON!
ON JOHNSON’S WIFE!
WHAT IS THE EMOTION EXPRESSED ON JACKIE’S FACE?
THEN GRIEF SEEMED TO OVERCOME THE CROWD IN THE PLANE AS JOHNSON IS SWORN IN AS PRESIDENT!
WHO IS THAT MAN IS WITH THE DARK EYEBROWS
IN THE LEFT CORNER AT THE BOTTOM?
THIS REMINDS ME OF A YOU-TUBE OF PRESIDENT CLINTON AFTER RON BROWN AND MANY OTHERS WERE KILLED IN PLANE CRASH! ONE MINUTE HE WAS HAPPY AND WHEN HE KNEW THAT THE CAMERA WAS ON HIM, HE CRIED!
I checked out this you-tube filming from the car behind the limo of President Kennedy and I took some close-up shots of the hands of Jackie’s double, because of Mary Moore’s testimony of seeing a white puppy dog between the President and his wife at the time of the assassination which she was ridiculed for that observation. Since reviewing, I thought it might be possible that she was seeing Jackie Kennedy’s gloved hands as their limo passed by her. So I keyed in on those hands and they seem rather large in comparison to her husband President Kennedy. White gloves can appear larger in video. White always looks larger and affects photography in funny ways, but nevertheless her/his hands seem extremely large especially the one closest to the President.
I am including a comparison of her/his hand waving and the President from this film following:
Her hand is opening and his hand is pointing forward on the right. Compare the relationship to their heads!
Her hand looks really huge like a man but even larger.
Her hand is closed again and it looks like a rose with thorns on the arm. Kind of an odd shape if you zoom in.
(and it looks like a silencer)
Jackie saluting behind and to the right possibly to a Secret Service guard (the one that is supposed to shield the President?)
Her hand size is about the same size as her head..maybe larger!
His hand is a little forward, but seems dramatically smaller in comparison to his head and normal.
Her hand looks abnormally GIGANTiC???
I can see why Mary Moore thought she saw
a fluffy white puppy between them.
The look of love is in your eyes
Truth may be stranger that fiction
in an automated kind-of-way!
Some of these guys supposedly boasted that they got the SOB (JFK) and the little bastard (Bobby Kennedy)!
At Bobby Kennedy’s assassination a woman with a polka dot dress was seen, but disappeared.
Maybe he is that woman!
Either she is packing a gun in her crotch or she is a HE!
It might be a good idea to have her pink suit examined for
traces of semen!
If she were actually a he it would explain what she did with the wedding ring at the hospital probably because she no longer had her gloves and the ring didn’t fit!
It would also explain the odd phone call from President LBJ to Jackie and would explain her odd replies.
Perhaps she was being framed and blackmailed:
…..From 1959 to 1961 eighty percent of the professional Catholic priests and Protestant ministers left Cuba for the United States. Relationships between the new government and congregations were tense, the new Cuban government was very limiting and suspicious of church operations, blaming them for collaboration with the CIA during the Bay of Pigs invasion and stockpiling arms provided for a “counter-revolution“.
I believe that Jackie was not really Jackie but a hit woman – how far fetched could it be that maybe she was a he and a hit man that was very effeminate with very large hands like in the picture above.
The one hiding his face
that has his arm around his companion on the right!
Kind of like
Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope
In my latest article
ROMAN CATHOLICISM STINKS!
Please read articles below: